Back

Knowledge / Measurement principles compared

Ring balance vs. electronic sensors — why the measuring principle matters for low-pressure measurement

For long-term monitoring of small differential pressures below 2 kPa, there is one measuring principle that is structurally unbeatable — and three that require regular intervention. The difference is not price, it is physics: electronic sensors age. The ring balance does not.

The four principles compared

PropertyRing balanceDiaphragm (strain gauge)CapacitivePiezoresistive
Measurement pathmechanical (torque)electrical (strain)electrical (capacitance)electrical (resistance)
Drift over 10 yearsphysically zero0.2–1 % p.a.0.1–0.5 % p.a.0.3–1 % p.a.
Readjustmentnot required (within specified operating conditions)every 12–24 monthsevery 12–24 monthsevery 6–12 months
Minimum span40 Pa100 Pa50 Pa250 Pa
Maximum span1,800 Paseveral barseveral barhundreds of bar
Aggressive mediavery goodmediumgoodpoor
Response / signal qualityspan-dependent — low-pass damping at small spans, fast at large spansms — software damping in controller typically requiredms — post-filtering requiredms — post-filtering required
On-site displayanalog 150×150 mm (standard) or digital LCDdigital, separatedigitaldigital
Power supplytransmitter only (optional)alwaysalwaysalways
Service life30+ years documented5–10 years5–10 years5–10 years
ATEX capableyes (intrinsically safe Ex ia)yesyesyes

Structural strengths of the ring balance

  • No drift, no readjustment: the measuring principle is based on a fixed weight and unchanging geometry — there is no ageing component in the measurement path. Calibration histories typically show no deviations, enabling significantly extended intervals.
  • Reliable with aggressive media: flue gas, biogas, acid vapours — everything that attacks diaphragms over months leaves the ring balance's sealing liquid barrier unaffected.
  • Resolution advantage below 100 Pa: in the sub-100 Pa range — typical for cleanroom pressure cascades and GMP requirements — electronic sensors operate at their resolution limit. The ring balance has a physical advantage here.
  • Stable signal without software filtering (at small spans): below ~200 Pa span — typical for cleanroom, GMP, and filter monitoring — the sealing liquid acts as a mechanical low-pass filter. Pressure spikes and turbulence are physically damped, keeping the reading steady. At larger spans the calibration weight increases, the restoring force grows, and response time shortens accordingly. Electronic sensors require software filtering regardless of span.
  • Permanent on-site visibility: depending on the variant, either a 150×150 mm analog scale (readable from two metres, no power needed) or a digital LCD — the measuring element always displays directly, no separate display module required.
  • ATEX Zone 0 intrinsically safe: the RW65_EX_II is developed as a fully certified Ex ia device — structurally simpler and legally safer than combined solutions.

Technical operating limits

  • Above 1,800 Pa span: the ring balance is designed for low-pressure differential measurement. For higher pressures, diaphragm sensor technology is the appropriate choice — this is outside our product range.
  • Dynamic pressure spikes below 100 ms: for pulsation or flow measurement requiring millisecond resolution, piezo sensor technology is required. For static room pressure monitoring and filter supervision, the ring balance response time is fully adequate.

Praxis

The "maintenance-free alternative" argument — and our response

Some manufacturers position their electronic diaphragm sensors as a "maintenance-free alternative to the ring balance." This refers to the elimination of sealing fluid — a valid simplification. However, the decisive question is different: how long does the calibration stay stable?

Diaphragm-based differential pressure sensors have documented drift rates of typically 0.3–1 % per year. For a 15 Pa pressure cascade, that means a deviation of 2–7 Pa by the fifth year of operation — half the monitored pressure differential itself. The ring balance measures purely mechanically: no ageing component in the measurement path, physically zero drift, no drift-induced readjustment.

For applications with long service intervals, regulated calibration requirements or aggressive media — cleanroom, GMP, pharma, biogas, furnace engineering — the ring balance is structurally the superior solution.

Is the ring balance right for your application?

01

How often should the device be readjusted or recalibrated?

  • As rarely as possible — plant runs continuouslyRing balance — no readjustment required
  • Calibration required by regulation (GMP, ISO 14644)Ring balance — drift-free, calibration history typically shows no deviations → intervals significantly extendable

02

Which medium is being measured?

  • Flue gas, biogas, acid vapours, contaminated airRing balance — resistant to aggressive media
  • Clean air, nitrogen, neutral gasesRing balance — also suitable

03

What pressure span is required?

  • Under 100 PaRing balance — clear resolution advantage
  • 100 Pa to 1,800 PaRing balance — full operating range
  • Above 1,800 PaOutside our range — contact us

Your application

Not sure whether a ring balance works in your application?

Send us your key data — span, medium, supply voltage, zone, environment — and we will tell you honestly which ring balance is the right choice.