Knowledge / Measurement principles compared
For long-term monitoring of small differential pressures below 2 kPa, there is one measuring principle that is structurally unbeatable — and three that require regular intervention. The difference is not price, it is physics: electronic sensors age. The ring balance does not.
The four principles compared
| Property | Ring balance | Diaphragm (strain gauge) | Capacitive | Piezoresistive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measurement path | mechanical (torque) | electrical (strain) | electrical (capacitance) | electrical (resistance) |
| Drift over 10 years | physically zero | 0.2–1 % p.a. | 0.1–0.5 % p.a. | 0.3–1 % p.a. |
| Readjustment | not required (within specified operating conditions) | every 12–24 months | every 12–24 months | every 6–12 months |
| Minimum span | 40 Pa | 100 Pa | 50 Pa | 250 Pa |
| Maximum span | 1,800 Pa | several bar | several bar | hundreds of bar |
| Aggressive media | very good | medium | good | poor |
| Response / signal quality | span-dependent — low-pass damping at small spans, fast at large spans | ms — software damping in controller typically required | ms — post-filtering required | ms — post-filtering required |
| On-site display | analog 150×150 mm (standard) or digital LCD | digital, separate | digital | digital |
| Power supply | transmitter only (optional) | always | always | always |
| Service life | 30+ years documented | 5–10 years | 5–10 years | 5–10 years |
| ATEX capable | yes (intrinsically safe Ex ia) | yes | yes | yes |
Praxis
Some manufacturers position their electronic diaphragm sensors as a "maintenance-free alternative to the ring balance." This refers to the elimination of sealing fluid — a valid simplification. However, the decisive question is different: how long does the calibration stay stable?
Diaphragm-based differential pressure sensors have documented drift rates of typically 0.3–1 % per year. For a 15 Pa pressure cascade, that means a deviation of 2–7 Pa by the fifth year of operation — half the monitored pressure differential itself. The ring balance measures purely mechanically: no ageing component in the measurement path, physically zero drift, no drift-induced readjustment.
For applications with long service intervals, regulated calibration requirements or aggressive media — cleanroom, GMP, pharma, biogas, furnace engineering — the ring balance is structurally the superior solution.
Is the ring balance right for your application?
01
How often should the device be readjusted or recalibrated?
02
Which medium is being measured?
03
What pressure span is required?
Your application
Send us your key data — span, medium, supply voltage, zone, environment — and we will tell you honestly which ring balance is the right choice.